a blockbuster of a deal
Posted: March 21, 2012 Filed under: optical nerve feed | Tags: optical nerve feed 2 Comments »a few days ago i decided to take advantage of blockbuster’s free trial of its total access program. it’s basically the netflix knockoff with the blockbuster logo.

the terms of the program seem self-explanatory. get your movies in the mail or in store. plus, i’d imagine that most people have wandered around a blockbuster late at night, in beat-up sweatshirts or jammies, looking for a movie at least once when they first opened. ah, the crispy bacony smell of nostalgia. so i signed up.
the process is pretty easy. after you sign up, you go online and load up your movie list with your faves, and in a few days you will get them in the mail. depending on what you select, you can get up to three movies/games at one time. when you mail them back, you get more movies/games on your list. again, just like netflix. as you can see in the pic, you can go to your local store and exchange your movies if you’re feeling impatient, and i was. hey, “unlimited in-store exchanges”, no? so i turned in my old movies and got new ones from the store. and after i got done with the new batch, i went back to the store to get some more movies.
the very polite clerk scanned the new new batch of movies, and said “$4.98 please.”
wha . . . ?
turns out, you can only get new movies at the store if you have movies from the mail. so once you get movies from the physical store and return them, you’ll have to wait for more movies in the mail before you can go back to the store again. unless you want to pay extra, of course.
so what’s with the “unlimited exchange” part? chalk it up to fine print, i guess.
and another thing. the business hours for the local stores listed on the blockbuster website are inaccurate. i checked the hours on bb’s website for a local store. when i got there, the store was already closed, and the hours at the store were totally different from bb’s website.
i’m very grateful for bb’s free trial, because i got to watch a few movies that i had wanted to watch. but their program just seems too disjointed, and with netflix and redbox gobbling up the video rental real estate, i don’t believe that bb will be around in two years. so i’ll be canceling the free trial soon. thanks bb, but no thanks. i’m curious to see if netflix is any better.
speaking of movies though, here are some movies and shows i watched lately.
the lincoln lawyer: a nice courtroom drama. not exactly a plot twister, but an entertaining movie nonetheless. a good rental.
source code: neat pseudo sci-fi thriller. i can’t talk about the movie because it’ll ruin the plot. watch it, it’s quite fun.
thor: meh. nowhere close to the new batman series with christian bale. try to watch it for free, cuz i wouldn’t pay for this one.
the warrior: family drama with mma trimmings. decent action. and kurt angle looked really intimidating; nicely done.
sucker punch: lame. don’t waste your time.
killer elite: kinda lame. you be the judge, but a rental at most.
the debt: cool spy drama with a twist. a solid rental.
colombiana: most critics trashed the movie, but it’s just your basic revenge action flick. i didn’t think it’s really that bad; it wasn’t groundbreaking, but it’s a good mindless action movie. good rental.
the adventures of tin tin: totally cool. if you didn’t grow up with tin tin, check out the comics and watch the movie. worth buying this one, and a great rental for you or your kids.
dexter season 6: F~*ING CRAZY. A MUST WATCH. buy or rent for this.
and since we’re on videos, watch this insane stop-motion vid with legos. C R A Z Y.
art vs. machine
Posted: November 9, 2011 Filed under: idioms & phrases, optical nerve feed, pig out, pool & billiards, postaweek2011 | Tags: idioms & phrases, optical nerve feed, pig out, pool & billiards, postaweek2011 2 Comments »when i have some downtime, i like to watch pool online. (i used to like watching it on tv, but there haven’t been any matches, not even reruns.) with the advent of youtube, you can find some truly interesting pool videos. seems like enterprising pool fans are really tapping into what video sharing sites have to offer, and we all benefit as a whole. (the same can be said for other sports and games too. i got to watch fencing on youtube; who knew fencing was fun to watch?) not only that, what were previously unavailable matches across the globe are now accessible within your fingertips.
if you can search in european languages, i’m sure you can find matches featuring various european pros not normally seen in the u.s. i happen to like watching filipino pros at work, so i’d dig around for that. over a lot of time and matches, the filipino style is making quite an impression on me. when i say filipino style, i mean that fluid, relaxed stroke many filipino pros seem to possess. this is a gross stereotype of course; not all filipino pros use that style, and a number of u.s. and european players possess that type of stroke too, but this is the easiest way to describe that particular way to play. (yeah, this is becoming a borderline lasciviously dirty a~*-licking man-love kind of post, but that’s not my intention.) when i watch the traditional style vs. the filipino style, it’s like watching machines vs. painters. the styles are so different, even though they both achieve the same thing: pocketing balls with shape.
with the traditional style, these words come to mind: machines, efficiency, business-like, exact, rigid, etc. filipino style, on the other hand, reminds me of these words: water, fluidity, relaxed poise, flow, easy grace, etc. i enjoy watching ralf souquent as much as the next person, but there’s something about that filipino style that is pleasing to my eyes. watching players like efren, busti, alcano, or even svb at work, makes me want to go play. they make pool almost mystical, beckoning me want to capture their magic and see if i can make things work the way they make it work. for example, watch this alcano video.
now compare alcano’s style with this ralf video.
the difference between souquet and alcano is drastic; both can shoot, but alcano does it with more style.
now our east coast brethren and sistren probably know all about five guys burgers. for us in cali, however, five guys is not a phrase in our burger vocabulary. i guess recently the company has decided to open up shop in socal. being a burger fan, i decided to give it a crack. i was too busy eating so i didn’t take any pictures. instead, i’m going to steal a pic from google’s image search.
image is from brooklynfans.com.
the unique part about five guys is the way you order your burger. you basically get a plain burger (cheese costs extra), then pile on whatever toppings they offer. all the toppings are included in the price, so you don’t pay extra for the fixings, meaning you can pile that burger pretty high if you want. one order of fries will feed at least two people, so just keep that in mind. when the food is ready, they put everything inside a big paper bag, and you can eat there or take it to go. the burger patty i had was very dense and meaty, designed to fill you up. all well and good, but i thought the patty wasn’t seasoned well (or at all). when i bit into the burger, it just tasted like meat; all the flavors came from the toppings. the burger was a three out of five effort: not bad, but not special. the fries though were very tasty. it’s cut on the thick side, and cooked nicely; the outside of the fry had a leathery feel that i found appealing, and the inside was soft. i liked the fries way better than the burger itself. in the paradigm of socal burger joints, i’d put five guys below the counter, fatburger, & in-n-out, and above the habit. in my opinion, five guys beat the habit on the strength of its fries alone; their burgers are about the same.
♦ ♦ ♦
this week, we’ll look at the origin of the phrase “gild the lily”.
the original phrase was written by shakespeare, in king john: ” . . . to gild refined gold, to paint the lily, to throw a perfume on the violet . . . is wasteful and ridiculous excess.” according to the phrase finder,
The context of that speech in the play is King John’s satisfaction with his second coronation – “Here once again we sit, once again crown’d”. His courtiers aren’t so sure, calling the crowning ‘superfluous’. The use of Shakespeare’s text to denote unnecessary ornamentation is fairly straightforward. After all, ‘to gild’ is to cover with a thin layer of gold, so ‘gilding refined gold’ is obviously unnecessary. Unfortunately, remembering text from Shakespeare isn’t everyone’s forte and the quotation has become rather garbled. As the quotation above shows, ‘gild the lily’ doesn’t appear in the original.
apparently, someone confused the phrase “to gild refined gold, to paint the lily” with “to gild the lily”, and that was that.
a sifter is good i suppose
Posted: October 12, 2011 Filed under: inward stare, optical nerve feed, pool & billiards, postaweek2011, random thoughts | Tags: inward stare, optical nerve feed, pool & billiards, postaweek2011, random thoughts 2 Comments »if i have absolutely no filter, it wouldn’t be good. we can be as blunt as we want really, but a little filter is always helpful to achieve a functional truce between people. the following are some examples of what i think as a knee-jerk reaction when i hear people say stuff, and the actions i may take after the thought goes through a filter. as you’ll quickly see, a little filter goes a long way.
“one pocket is my game.”
gut instinct: no. one pocket is the game you prefer to play because you have no stroke and can’t run out consistently, and this game ensures that you’ll have at least one turn at the table most of the time.
filtered action: smile and nod.
“i can’t seem to dial my aim in no matter where i look at the ball.”
gut instinct: your stroke is crooked and your neck is craned at an extremely uncomfortable angle. your eyeballs are not even in the equation.
filtered action: poker face.
“i’m a pretty good shot.”
gut instinct: no you’re not.
filtered action: blank expression.
“you should’ve banked it this way.”
gut instinct: you don’t even know enough to see what i was trying to do, do you?
filtered action: look around absentmindedly.
“i got robbed on that shot.”
gut instinct: no, you shot it bad.
filtered action: discreet cough.
“i have the worst luck on the table.”
gut instinct: you have the worst skills on the table.
filtered action: an imperceptible nod.
“i can’t get draw with a hard tip.”
gut instinct: your stroke sucks.
filtered action: stare straight ahead with a blank expression.
complete stranger: “what kinda cue you shoot with?”
gut instinct: tryin’ to figure out if you can rob me or somethin’?
filtered action: “a no-name sneaky hardly worthy of attention.”
“you should be ranked higher.”
gut instinct: you should be ranked out of humanity.
filtered action: go back to the shot.
“how come you don’t play tournaments?”
gut instinct: cuz i’m too lazy.
filtered action: “cuz i’m too lazy.”
i better stop before i hurt myself. btw, there are people way more blunt and brutal than me, and they’ll actually say it. so before you make a fool of yourself, think about what random comments you’ll say to others so you don’t look like a complete idiot. and yes, i speak from experience.
♦ ♦ ♦
spoiler alert: the following contains spoilers to the movie “conviction”. if you haven’t seen the movie yet and want to watch for yourself, stop reading here.
recently i watched a movie called conviction, starring hilary swank and sam rockwell. here’s a trailer.
the movie is inspired by the real-life story of kenneth “kenny” waters and betty anne waters. kenneth waters, a man from ayers, massachusetts, was convicted of first-degree murder in 1983. betty anne waters, sister of kenny, spent the next 18 years to free her brother, including getting a law degree so she could work on the case herself. being a single mother of two kids (the movie had hinted that her efforts to free her brother had cost her the marriage), she worked at a bar to support herself on top of going to law school full time. while in school, she began writing to the innocence project asking for their help, and barry scheck, the attorney from the project, agreed to to work with her. all these responsibilities exerted considerable strain on her life, but with the help of her good friend abra rice (played by minnie driver), ms. waters eventually passed the bar exam to become an attorney. through her studies, she became aware of dna testing and was able to locate old evidence from her brother’s case. the dna tests, together with the efforts of scheck, waters, and rice, eventually exonerated her brother of the crime. kenny waters, having spent 18 years in jail, was finally freed in 2001.
although the plot was very straightforward and predictable, the acting was quite good. i thought the movie was intriguing, so i googled a bit to find some more information about the case. i found an interview of betty anne waters that shed some additional information not in the movie. according to ms. waters, kenny died a mere six months after his release, a heartbreaking demise since mr. waters barely got to enjoy his freedom. also, according to the movie, one of the arresting officers was a woman named nancy taylor, who had coerced witnesses to testify against mr. waters and lied about the evidence in the case. based on the interview however, taylor was never a police officer; she was a dispatcher and the secretary to the ayers’ chief of police. ms. waters stated that taylor had badly wanted to become police, and proving that kenny waters was the murderer was one way of showing everyone she was capable.
despite the fact that the guilty parties who wronged kenny waters were never punished, the central theme of the movie was about love. betty anne waters’ love for her brother was so unshakable that she basically sacrificed her life to free her brother. when everything was stacked against her brother, she believed in him and never considered the notion that her brother could be a murderer. i personally think the siblings’ bond is the best part about the film. anyway, the movie makes for a decent rental, and a good flick to watch with your loved ones.





27b/6
AZBilliards
billiard traveler
cuetable.com
dennis prager
despair.com
FAIL blog
hyperbole and a half
insidePool magazine
it is what it is . . . and that is all
jacka~* letters
japanese snack reviews
jim's pancakes
kicks, banks, caroms and combos
omgwtf
oN a miSsioN…..
on the rail tv
pool & billiard magazine
pool minnow
quilt & b~*
sleep talkin' man
That Moral Squint
The Action Report
zomblog
fresh fat-chaws